Tara's Buffet and Lunch Service in Huntingdonshire

Absolute shocking service. Spent 70 pound then missed my daughters korma. Told me I sounded drunk and wanted to charge me 7 pound for missing food they missed. Tried playing the racist card when I challenged . Haha what joke having to do my daughter some other food now wow!!!!

Easy and fast access to quite nice food.

Food has been good when I've ordered in the past, biggest issue is the place is so unreliable, you never know if it's going to be open so don't ever rely on it.

Ordered about 2 hours ago !!!! Never got it!!! Luckily we going pay with cash but DO NOT GO HERE USELESS COMPANY

The arrangement between a private entity and the council, where taxpayers fund £80 a night for accommodations ostensibly meant to support homeless individuals, is deeply troubling. This setup not only squanders public funds but also subjects vulnerable people to dehumanizing treatment reminiscent of George Orwell’s 1984. For starters, the price tag—£80 per night—is exorbitant for what is typically basic, often substandard, accommodation. Such inflated costs, funded by taxpayers, are a blatant example of profiteering at the expense of the public purse. The lack of transparency regarding how these funds are allocated raises significant questions about oversight and accountability. Who benefits from this arrangement, and why are such high rates deemed acceptable when more cost-effective and humane alternatives likely exist? The treatment of the homeless residents compounds the issue. Reports of pervasive surveillance, with security staff listening in on conversations through an extensive camera network, are chilling. Such measures, far from providing safety, create an oppressive environment where individuals are stripped of dignity and privacy. The implication that homeless people must be monitored so intrusively perpetuates harmful stereotypes, reducing them to objects of suspicion rather than human beings deserving of support and respect. This Orwellian approach undermines the purpose of such accommodations: to provide a safe, supportive space for individuals at their most vulnerable. Instead, the invasive surveillance fosters mistrust and humiliation, leaving residents feeling more marginalized than ever. The council must urgently review this arrangement. A thorough investigation into the costs and conditions is needed, alongside meaningful consultation with the individuals directly impacted. Public funds should be directed toward solutions that prioritize dignity, privacy, and genuine rehabilitation—not profit-driven schemes that treat homelessness as an opportunity for exploitation.